DodgeTalk Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
28,764 Posts
haha...Maybe some cal-tracs are in order?? This deal is going on through Monday night, so you have a few days to think about it. Bob and I arent going to do another one of these group buys for a long time, if ever, so dont miss out this time.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,112 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I think I'll be able to get by with no traction bars, I've got a few more things I can still try before I have to resort to that option. But if I do have to get T-bars, Caltracs will be what I go with.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,718 Posts
HEMI450HP said:
Thats what I was thinking. I would have been thrilled with a 1.71.
That great low end torque, to get his truck up and moving, must have came from his own hand ported heads. His heads with just basically a pocket port show's some mighty good gains as far as throttle response and torque.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,112 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
I still haven't figured out where that 1.71 came from on the board. My 60' on that run was a 1.82...

R/T .171(wasn't too worried about a stock GT ;) )
60' 1.828
330' 5.315
1/8 8.285
mph 81.69
1000' 10.898
1/4 13.112
mph 101.71
Density Altitude 1346'
DAC time, [email protected] Pretty pleased with that run considering my 60' was off by almost 1/10th.

Any clue where the 1.71 came from??

That little extra compression probaly didn't hurt anything either..
 

· *********
Joined
·
1,971 Posts
Your reaction time perhaps? they usually show that at the track when i go but the show it like that a .171 reaction time show up as a 1.71 on the board
 

· Ramman
Joined
·
1,598 Posts
that 1.71 was your reaction time, right?

still a good 60 @ 1.82

how did that Charger do after you?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,112 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Daking said:
that 1.71 was your reaction time, right?

still a good 60 @ 1.82

how did that Charger do after you?
My 60' is usually right at 1.75-1.76 every run, the dude kept me in the water when I was doing my burnout and I didn't know it.

Not too good, there was only one SRT vehicle there that was running better than me, and it was a supercharged 300C.. I think the best time the 300 ran was a [email protected]. And there was 2 SRT magnums, abotu 7-8 Chargers, 2 300C's, and one GCSRT-8, the jeep did run a slightly better time, his best was 12.98 to my 13.05 that day, but he wasn't exactly stock either.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,718 Posts
From what I've seen from that particular run is that you ran a 1.71 60' vs a 2.04 60' in the oposite lane. I hope you guy's didn't sleep that long at the lights. I just read what I saw is all.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,112 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
My R/T on that run was .171 and the mustangs was .204, I guess they can't move the decimal on the board. Granted that's not great but I really wasn't worried about treeing the mustang, I had already seen him run and new I could take him easily. My other R/T's that day was a .094, and a .022.. I can cut a decent light when I need to. :) I figured I needed some help running a SRT-8 Charger, and a WS6 T/A..
 

· Registered
Joined
·
444 Posts
Did you install your injectors yet?
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top