Thoughts on increasing torque on Magnum 318... - DodgeTalk : Dodge Car Forums, Dodge Truck Forums and Ram Forums
 
Thread Tools
#1 Old 10-26-2005, 09:28 PM
Dirt_devil
Registered User
 
Dirt_devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Thoughts on increasing torque on Magnum 318...

Just kicking around an idea here... In the search for more low-end torque from a Magnum 5.2, and knowing that a smaller bore on the throttle body= higher intake air velocity and therefore better low end torque and throttle response, could a 3.9 throttle body (bored to smooth airflow as thefastman does) provide better low end torque? Has anyone tried anything like this? I am wondering if there is a point of diminishing return on the small end of the bore size. Could there be a sweet spot that is lower than the 50mm bore that most of us are currently running? If anyone had a 3.9 TB sitting around that they would be willing to give up for cheap I would be interested in testing this out. ...... I do imagine that top end power would be lower, but how low?? Your thoughts on this can make for some interesting conversation in the least!
Dirt_devil is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 10-26-2005, 11:05 PM
Volphin
Registered User
 
Volphin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
More Torque?

Interesting! Can you imagine the velocity of gasses through that TB? The PCM would freak and work like heck to lean you out...

What you need is a towing cam, roller rockers and hardened pushrods from Fastman. Yes it is "going deep". But hey, you wanted torque?!

Also, how about changing your gearset?

HTH

ASE Certified Master Tech, MoTech Class of '85
2001 D+ Platinum
5.9L, 4x4, 46RE, 9.25 Axle w/3:55, Speed Prop Tow Pkg, Kleen Wheels, IP Stage II, 52mm FMTB, PPH Headers with Jet Hot Sterling, Mopar M1, 1.7RRs and Magnum VCs, Smith Bros. Hardened Pushrods, B&G M1 Flash, Go Rhino! Sumatra 3000 Brush Guards, PIAA 580s, Optima Red Top, Mag-Hytec Diff Cover, Mag-Hytec Trans Pan. I'll bore you .060 over if you stroke my crank.
Volphin is offline  
#3 Old 10-27-2005, 12:05 AM
zerko
Registered User
 
zerko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sudbury ,Ontario
Posts: 510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree with Volphin. Would look at cam, computer, exhaust,gearing,etc. I think that your computer would be so confused, the engine wouldn't run
at-all. Tried swapping computer from a one-year older truck, and nothing!

If I could buy My truck as a Brand New unit today, I definately would!
zerko is offline  
#4 Old 10-27-2005, 10:46 PM
Dirt_devil
Registered User
 
Dirt_devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
(Thread Starter)
Well, a cam, computer, exhaust, etc. are deffinitely things I intend to do in the future to achieve the performance I am looking for, and I am not intending that this would be a replacement mod for any of those. I am just pondering the idea as to what results you would get.
Now as far as the computer goes... correct me if I am wrong, but the Magnum engines are tuned by a "speed density" system, which means that the fueling (based on airflow) and timing are determined based on load and engine RPM. The load is calculated using inputs from the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor, throttle position sensor (TPS), while the airflow is calculated based on these two sensors and the IAT sensor (for air density). Between these inputs and the values in the VE (volumetric efficiency) table, the required fuel can be calculated. The O2 sensor checks to make sure the calculations are correct, and corrects the fuelling if needed. When corrections are made the computer "remembers" the changes, and eventually "learns" what changes need to be made in the VE table.
So... the volumetric efficiency would be decreased slightly by the smaller throttle body, but the computer would still be reading off of the same VE table (thinking the engine has a greater VE than it actually does) and it would tend to run rich... I would think anyway. The computer would learn these changes to the VE table anyway though, via the O2 sensor.

I think that someone needs to try this... Anyone have a 3.9 TB sitting around???
Dirt_devil is offline  
#5 Old 10-28-2005, 12:12 AM
zerko
Registered User
 
zerko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sudbury ,Ontario
Posts: 510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
you've put wat too much thought into this, to not do it would be Wrong!
Let us know how it turns out.

If I could buy My truck as a Brand New unit today, I definately would!
zerko is offline  
#6 Old 10-28-2005, 09:21 AM
Volphin
Registered User
 
Volphin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do it.

Get a wrench. hahaha. I concur, try it. But the PCM is still a simple block learn system. There's more HP in a pda.

ASE Certified Master Tech, MoTech Class of '85
2001 D+ Platinum
5.9L, 4x4, 46RE, 9.25 Axle w/3:55, Speed Prop Tow Pkg, Kleen Wheels, IP Stage II, 52mm FMTB, PPH Headers with Jet Hot Sterling, Mopar M1, 1.7RRs and Magnum VCs, Smith Bros. Hardened Pushrods, B&G M1 Flash, Go Rhino! Sumatra 3000 Brush Guards, PIAA 580s, Optima Red Top, Mag-Hytec Diff Cover, Mag-Hytec Trans Pan. I'll bore you .060 over if you stroke my crank.
Volphin is offline  
#7 Old 10-29-2005, 08:31 AM
Almond Pale Ale
Patriot....
 
Almond Pale Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Miami, 'the 305'
Posts: 3,375
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had a 95 Dakota 5.2L with the 5 speed and 3.91 rear end - though I never dyno'd it, it was pretty quick off the block.

My 99 Durango however has been dyno'd and put out 282ft/lbs at the rear wheels (all mods below EXCEPT the Hypertech). From that, I can extrapolate that good air in and a good flow out (headers, Y pipe and exhaust) alone will produce an increase in torque. 1.7RRs or good 1.6 and a cam will do even more.

2004 Ram 2500 4x4 SLT, 305/555 CTD, 48RE, QC, LB
Intake: aFe Stage I intake, aFe Torque Tube Exhuast: IMCO HD performance muffler Drivetrain: PML rear diff cover, PML Tranny cover, Bilstein shocks Power: Diablosport Power Puck set on 60hp/100tq Fluids: AMSOIL front to back
CTD Enthusiast Club Member #47
Almond Pale Ale is offline  
#8 Old 11-02-2005, 10:48 PM
Freddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I thought I remember reading some on here, that helped flat lined the torque curve. I can't remember what its called. They had an article about it, it was on a well built 454 chevy engine. I think it had something to do with increasing the vacuum line pressure. But I can't remember
Freddy is offline  
#9 Old 11-03-2005, 01:21 AM
lbeenken
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mason City
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Get a Comp Extreme Energy 4x4 cam. They have all sorts of bottom end torque.

2001 Quadcab 4x4 HO Cummins & 6 spd 80hp BD injectors, Edge EZ, Banks power elbow with 4" straight pipe into 5" stacks, Autometer boost and pyro gauges in the pillar, Southbend metallic CON FE clutch, Banks High Ram Intake

dyno'd at 300HP and 810TQ at the rears
360HP and 970TQ at the crank
lbeenken is offline  
#10 Old 11-03-2005, 01:55 AM
BVRmonger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbeenken
Get a Comp Extreme Energy 4x4 cam. They have all sorts of bottom end torque.
Yeah. I don't believe a smaller throttle would net you any torque.
more compression would.
BVRmonger is offline  
#11 Old 11-05-2005, 08:48 AM
HankL
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central NC
Posts: 1,733
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Nonsense!

A smaller throttle body
is just like a large throttle body
with the throttle blades partially closed - no torque advantage.
HankL is offline  
#12 Old 11-05-2005, 09:21 AM
charlie1935
Senior Member
 
charlie1935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: DuQuoin
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
supercharger!!supercharger
charlie1935 is offline  
#13 Old 11-05-2005, 09:28 AM
87DakBuilder
Stroked & TKO'd
 
87DakBuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Waldorf
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not sure about the torque possibilities, but a guy on one of my other forums modded a v6 tb, and was able to get just about as much horse power and torque from it as he did from his stock v8 tb. He did it to show that the V8 tb swap wasn't really worth doing if you knew how to port tb's with a dremel. In fact I think it is still up on Dakotausa.com. Not sure though.

Jay
87DakBuilder is offline  
#14 Old 11-05-2005, 09:06 PM
bocephus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Change the cam profile.....
bocephus is offline  
Closed Thread

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to use most of our features, you must first register.
Please enter your desired User Name, your Email Address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
The registration process requires you to activate your membership by following a link in an E-Mail that will be sent to you immediately upon completing this form. You must enter a valid email address or you will not receive this activation code and you will NOT be registered. Your E-Mail address is NOT publicly available to anyone as policy.

AOL E-MAIL USERS: Please click HERE for important info pertaining to your e-mail address.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2006 Magnum SRT-8 Photos Here! FreeLantz Dodge Magnum SRT-8 Talk 25 08-01-2005 08:11 PM
2006 Dodge Magnum, What's New for '06 RAM MAN Rumor Mill & Gossip Talk 1 07-13-2005 10:21 AM
2006 Dodge Magnum SRT8: Beefed-up American Muscle RAM MAN Rumor Mill & Gossip Talk 2 01-08-2005 04:52 PM
Press Release: All-New 2006 Magnum SRT-8 FreeLantz Rumor Mill & Gossip Talk 2 01-05-2005 08:15 PM
2005 Dodge Magnum Engineering Press Releases RAM MAN Rumor Mill & Gossip Talk 0 03-03-2004 09:55 AM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome